Serving People Throughout Colorado

Call Us For Free Consultation:

Text messages are often at the forefront of criminal cases, but their role is not always as clear-cut as people expect. A Denver criminal defense lawyer knows that texts can be challenged in court and may not carry the weight prosecutors want them to. At The Law Offices of Steven J. Pisania, we closely examine how messages are collected, presented, and interpreted, as these details can significantly impact the outcome of a case.

Many people are surprised to learn that text messages rarely decide a case on their own. Judges and juries typically seek more than a brief message on a screen, and they often require additional context before finding it convincing. What may seem obvious outside the courtroom can become far less specific once the legal process begins.

Here are several ways text messages can be used in Colorado courts and why a strong defense can make all the difference.

Key Takeaways

  • Text messages may seem like strong evidence, but Colorado courts require proof that they are authentic and truly linked to the accused.
  • A single text rarely tells the whole story, and context can completely change how a message is understood in court.
  • Judges and juries often require more than text conversations alone, making a strong defense strategy essential.

Texts Must Be Authenticated

Courts in Colorado require proof before text messages are accepted as evidence. Prosecutors must demonstrate that the accused person actually sent the message, which often involves the use of phone records or digital analysis. Without that connection, a criminal defense attorney in Denver, CO can challenge the evidence and argue it should be excluded.

Judges look for reliability before allowing texts into a case. Witnesses, forensic experts, or detailed records may be used to establish a connection between a message and the defendant. If those links are weak, the defense has a strong chance to prevent the texts from influencing the jury.

A Phone Number Does Not Equal Identity

A text message linked to your phone number does not prove you sent it. Phones can be borrowed, stolen, or accessed without permission, which makes authorship less specific. Prosecutors must show more than a number on a screen to convince a court that the message is yours.

Defense attorneys often use this gap to challenge the reliability of text evidence. They highlight how easy it is for someone else to use a device and create doubt about who sent the message. This can weaken the case against you and shift the focus back on the prosecution’s burden of proof.

Context Can Change Everything

A single text pulled out of a thread can look far worse than it really is. Courts in Colorado recognize that omitting parts of a conversation can mislead a jury and create false impressions. A Denver, Colorado defense attorney can push to admit the entire exchange so the true meaning comes through.

Tone, sarcasm, and intent often become clear only when the whole thread is reviewed. What appears harmful in isolation may look harmless once the rest of the conversation is shown. This gives the defense a powerful way to challenge how the evidence is presented.

Texts Alone Rarely Secure Convictions

Text messages are often introduced as evidence, but they rarely carry enough weight on their own to secure a conviction. Courts want more than a short line of text and usually expect other forms of proof to back it up. 

The prosecution must connect messages to a larger picture before a jury will rely on them:

  • Supporting Witness Testimony – Witnesses can confirm or challenge what a text suggests, providing jurors with a clearer understanding of what actually happened. Without that live perspective, the words on a screen lose much of their impact.
  • Physical or Digital Evidence – Items such as surveillance footage or forensic data provide the kind of independent verification that texts often lack. These forms of evidence can either strengthen or weaken the meaning of a conversation.
  • Contextual Records – Phone logs, call histories, or related communications can show whether the text lines up with other actions. When inconsistencies appear, the defense can use them to attack the prosecution’s case.

A skilled defense strategy makes it clear that texts without strong support are weak evidence and should not be used to decide the outcome.

Hearsay Issues Can Block Admission

Many text messages fall into the category of hearsay, which limits their admissibility in court. Colorado evidence rules often prevent these messages from being admitted unless a narrow exception applies. A criminal defense attorney in Denver, CO, can challenge the use of these texts and work to exclude them from the trial.

Hearsay rules exist to protect against unreliable statements. A message sent outside the courtroom does not allow for cross-examination, which makes it less trustworthy. This opens the door for the defense to argue that the jury should not consider such evidence.

Fighting Back With a Denver Criminal Defense Lawyer

Text messages may appear damaging, but they rarely tell the whole story inside a courtroom. A skilled attorney can expose gaps in the prosecution’s evidence and challenge how texts are being used against you. Having a Denver criminal defense lawyer on your side ensures that one message does not decide your future.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can you be convicted based only on text messages?

Text messages can appear damaging, but they rarely stand alone in a criminal case. Courts often require additional proof, such as testimony or records, before considering it strong evidence.

How do courts in Colorado decide if text messages are valid?

For a text to be used in a Colorado courtroom, prosecutors must prove it is authentic and truly linked to the accused. A defense lawyer can challenge that process by questioning phone records, forensic methods, or witness claims.

Do deleted text messages still get used in court?

Even when a message is deleted from a phone, investigators may still recover it from carriers or use forensic tools. The way that evidence is collected can be challenged, and its connection to the accused is not always clear-cut.

/

Request a FREE Case Review